Skip to content
National Coalition for Literacy
  • Adult Literacy
    • Adult Literacy
    • About Adult Learners
    • Literacy and Numeracy Skills of U.S. Adults
    • Key Terms and Definitions
    • Adult Education in the United States
    • Adult Learners’ Stories
    • Return on Investment
  • Advocacy
    • About Advocacy
    • Asset-Oriented Advocacy
    • Advocacy Communication
    • National AEFL Week
    • International Literacy Day
    • Advocacy Resources
      • Adult Learners’ Stories
  • Programs That Work
    • Programs That Work
    • Exemplary Programs
    • Program Models and Blueprints
    • Return on Investment
    • Program Directories
  • News and Issues
    • News and Issues
    • NCL Blog
    • NCL Communications and Comments
    • Joint Communications with Colleague Organizations
    • ALL IN: The Adult Literacy & Learning Impact Network
  • About NCL
    • About NCL
    • Mission, Vision, and Impact
    • Governance and Leadership
    • Our Current Members
    • History
    • Contact
  • Join Us
    • Join Us
    • Become an Organizational Member
    • Become an Individual Member
    • Donate
    • Contact
  • Membership Form

National Coalition for Literacy

Adult Education Transforms Lives

NCL Response to NRS Comment Request

NCL Response to NRS Comment Request

July 31, 2020

On July 23, 2020, the Office of Career, Technical, and Adult Education (OCTAE) posted a request for comment on Measures and Methods for the National Reporting System for Adult Education. NCL’s response made four key points:

  • Supported the proposed addition of outcomes reporting of Measurable Skill Gains (MSGs) other than Educational Functioning Level (EFL) gain and secondary school diploma or equivalent for participants in Integrated Education and Training (IET) programs;
  • Advocated for allowing similar reporting breadth for all program models, particularly workplace literacy, integrated English literacy and civics education (IELCE), and workforce preparation;
  • Advocated for inclusion of a summary table that would allow programs to report overall totals for each outcome type, especially achievement of a high school diploma or equivalent, for the benefit of employers, policy makers, and other stakeholders;
  • Suggested eliminating the distinction between in-person and distance education, recognizing that most programs now operate with blended models, and advocated for the development of a set of competencies and related outcomes for digital literacy, which is not measured anywhere in the current NRS tables.

NCL’s overall objective was to provide observations and suggestions that would allow the NRS to present a full picture of program capabilities and outcomes. NCL also believes that implementation of its suggestions would give the NRS an active role in encouraging programs to develop and offer programming that responds to employer needs and postsecondary requirements as these relate to adult learners’ goals.

Read the full NCL comment.

Share this:

  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

Like this:

Like Loading...

Related


Advocacy
NRS

Post navigation

PREVIOUS
Census in Your Community: Interviews with Juvencio Rocha Peralta
NEXT
Census 2020: Your Senator Needs to Hear from You
Comments are closed.
SUPPORT OUR WORK

National Coalition for Literacy + P.O. Box 2932, Washington, DC 20013 + [email protected]

National Coalition for Literacy, nationalcoalitionforliteracy.org, and national-coalition-literacy.org are trademarks of the National Coalition for Literacy.

© 2025   All Rights Reserved.
%d